RED REACTIONS
Menu navigation

news · movies

Danny Boyle Confirms Ink Uses Generative AI — After Warning AI Could Replace Journalists

Danny Boyle has confirmed his new film Ink uses about 30 seconds of generative AI, days after warning that AI could replace journalists and teachers. Here's exactly what he said and what the AI was used for.

By Sara Avegaard4 min read
Filed underMovies·Drama
Jack O'Connell as Larry Lamb standing in a dimly lit industrial newsroom setting in Danny Boyle's Ink.
Jack O'Connell as Larry Lamb standing in a dimly lit industrial newsroom setting in Danny Boyle's Ink.Netflix

Danny Boyle has confirmed that Ink uses around 30 seconds of generative AI, primarily to animate old photographs and create a handful of digital mice. The disclosure, made to Vanity Fair, lands just days after Boyle used his Venice press rounds to warn that AI could replace journalists and teachers — a timing gap that’s drawn attention, even though the two comments aren’t addressing quite the same question.

What Boyle Actually Confirmed

Boyle told Vanity Fair that generative AI was used for about 30 seconds total in Ink, specifically to animate old photographs — including images of Margaret Thatcher and the Kray twins — and to create mice running around the newsroom of The Sun. That’s a specific, bounded use: limited archival-photo animation and a small amount of CG-style animal work, not whole scenes or performances generated by AI.

Boyle has a practical reason for using AI on the animals specifically. He’s said he ran into trouble with PETA over using real chimpanzees in 28 Days Later and has leaned on computer-generated animals ever since; generative AI, in his telling, is simply the newest version of that same workaround.

On AI as a tool more broadly, Boyle told Vanity Fair it’s “a very useful tool in many ways, provided you use it respectfully and provided you pay actors if you’re going to replace them with some kind of AI embodiment.” That’s a conditional endorsement — useful within limits, contingent on compensation — not a blanket defense of generative AI in film production.

Confirmed vs. Still Interpretation

Question Status
Did Ink use generative AI? Confirmed by Boyle
Approximate amount About 30 seconds
Whole scenes AI-generated? No evidence of that
Old photographs animated? Confirmed — Thatcher and the Kray twins
Mice imagery Confirmed, generative AI
Did Boyle criticize AI days earlier? Yes, at Venice on September 2
Main concern in that criticism AI replacing journalists and teachers
Did Boyle say all AI use is unacceptable? Not established

Before Boyle’s confirmation, some of this was speculation rather than fact. Critic Luke Hearfield initially flagged the Thatcher and Kray-twins imagery as looking AI-generated, then walked that back as more of a “knee-jerk response.” Separately, a “generative AI visual effects supervisor and producer” credit for Dillan Nicholls turned up on Ink’s crew listing. Boyle’s own statement to Vanity Fair is what actually settles it — not the earlier guesswork.

Is Boyle Contradicting His Own AI Criticism?

There’s an obvious tension worth examining, but it’s worth being precise about what Boyle actually said on each side of it. At Venice on September 2, his warning was specifically about AI replacing entire professions: “The danger with the tech giants and their AI is that they will be able to replace journalism,” he said, adding that teachers face the same risk because they’re “one of those tentpoles that hold up our society.” He called the trend “insane.”

That’s a statement about AI displacing human labor and judgment in journalism and education — not a claim that generative AI has no legitimate, limited role in filmmaking. Using AI to animate two archival photographs and generate a few background mice doesn’t replace a journalist, a teacher, or an actor’s performance. Whether that distinction fully resolves the tension is a fair thing for readers to weigh for themselves; the two positions aren’t automatically the same claim, and treating them as identical overstates what either statement actually says.

About Ink

Ink is Danny Boyle’s adaptation of James Graham’s stage play, starring Guy Pearce as Rupert Murdoch and Jack O’Connell as Larry Lamb, with Claire Foy as Jules Davies. It follows Lamb’s rise as editor of The Sun under Murdoch’s ownership in the newspaper’s early tabloid era. The film opened the 83rd Venice Film Festival on September 2 before moving on to Telluride, and Netflix has it booked for a limited theatrical run starting December 11 ahead of streaming in the U.S. and Latin America on January 8, 2027.

Sources

Related coverage

PreviousSupergirl Hits HBO Max September 10 — Here's the Full Theatrical-to-Streaming Timeline

About the author

Sara Avegaard

Movies & TV Writer

Sara Avegaard is a movie and television enthusiast with a strong interest in entertainment news, upcoming releases and the latest developments across film and streaming. At Red Reactions, she focuses on movies, TV, streaming and breaking entertainment stories.